Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Mitchener Chronicles
http://mitchenerchronicles.blogspot.com/2008/10/fighting-fu.html
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Hilarious and Disappointing
For Your Info: If you had purchased $1,000.00 of Delta Air Lines stock one year ago you would have $49.00 left. With Enron, you would have had $16.50 left of the original $1,000.00. With WorldCom, you would have had less than $5.00 left. But, if you had purchased $1,000.00 worth of beer one year ago, drank all of the beer, then turned in the cans for the aluminum recycling REFUND, you would have $214.00 cash. Based on the above, the best current investment advice is to drink heavily and recycle. It's called the 401-Keg A recent study found the average American walks about 900 miles a year. Another study found Americans drink, on the average, 22 gallons of alcohol a year. That means, on average, Americans get about 41 miles to the gallon. Makes You Proud To Be An American! |
Unfortunately for me, I'm not an American. In fact, I'm currently attempting to renew my residency to the US, which proves that I am not, nor will I be soon, a citizen of this country. All the same, I think the ratio difference between American's and European's is quite amusing. American's don't really walk very much. 900 miles a year is barely moving your legs if you think about it. That means that in a single day you only walk about 2.5 miles. That's nothing!
In truth though, the ratio for the English would probably be about the same. See, we walk a lot. Probably upwards of 5 miles a day. My grandmother walks almost 7 every day, and she's 80. Imagine what we youngsters can do! Of course this just means that in order to maintain a comfortable 41 miles per gallon, we are forced to consume more alcohol. I know it seems rough, but we suck it up. We wouldn't want to be hyper efficient and weigh in at 200 miles per gallon now would we?
Friday, September 12, 2008
Have I Got This Right?
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Sarah-Palin-John-McCains-Republican-Running-Mate-Says-War-With-Russia-May-Be-Necessary/Article/200809215097920?f=rss
For those who won't read it, here you go: It's about how Palin says that America may have to go to war with Russia if the country chooses to attack/invade anyone else. Strong declaration for a vice-presidential candidate, don't you think? She's not even in office yet and she's setting the bar for war. I want to know where these troops are coming from, because they sure aren't coming from Iraq if the republican party wins the election. Maybe she should have just said "I would like to stretch our supply lines so thin we can't win any war at all!"
I found the opening line of the article the most interesting kickoff of any article I've read in quite some time. It opens with the words "The 44-year-old mother-of-five..." I'm glad to see she has been keeping herself busy while not dealing with politics. Those last three kids probably just walked right out of her body carrying pamphlets that read: "vote for mommy, she's a beauty pageant winner!"
Mainly, I just want to make sure I have this right: Sarah Palin is a vice-presidential candidate for a man who, if gets elected president, will have a heart attack before his first week in office is up. She has five children, won a beauty pageant way back when, got her ex-brother-in-law fired from his job, and is already planning on going to war with Russia.
Did I miss anything?
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Red Ring of Death
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Never Forget Elephants
I'm the type of person who is often scared by stupid things. I'm not talking about thriller movies or roller coasters, but rather real life situations that happen to all of us. For example, if I'm walking down the street and I see a man wearing a black hoodie in the summer, I assume I'm about to get mugged. It's a defence mechanism. In some ways, I suppose I over think things. I keep building the little things up higher and higher until my once ankle tall mound of dirt has become a mountain of conspiracies and ridiculous fears. I say this because it's important to understand that I'm not ignorant of my irrational fears. I have never been mugged by a hoodie-wearing punk with thirty-six piercings in his nose, nor do I know anyone who has been mugged by a similar looking individual, but that doesn't stop me being prepared for it to happen.
Knowing this about me, imagine how afraid I must have been when I saw the Taiwanese elephants paint self portraits several months ago. They would take a paintbrush in their trunks, dip it into some paint, and paint a picture of an elephant holding a pretty little flower in its trunk. The worst part is that the picture wasn't even bad! I'm no artist, but I don't think I could ever paint an elephant as well as these elephants can. When I'm bested by animals that lack higher level thinking, I start to worry. People were cheering, clapping, gasping, and awing.
I wasn't.
I was too busy thinking about what this could mean for our generation. Elephants are smart, we already know that, but just how smart? They are the only other animal in the world that suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Once, they were kind and friendly creatures. Now, they are becoming increasingly violent and are hunting down humans for sport. Not only that, but they have been known to use sticks as weapons, open doors, sneak around in dark places and wait for people to unsuspectingly walk into a trap where six or seven elephants will pounce out and attack. Elephants are dangerous.
I suppose that's why I didn't applaud. I was suddenly afraid. If elephants are smart enough to open doors, use tools, and paint pictures, I firmly believe they are smart enough to be up to something sneaky. I think these paintings were a mere distraction. A false sense of security, if you will. I wasn't buying it.
I left the show and vowed never to live in a country that was prone to elephants. Those animals are just getting too smart for their own good, and I don't want to be there when our relationship with them goes sour.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Yes, our Olympians are 16...
What are the American girls doing? I saw a 21 year old woman doing gymnastics! People shouldn't be competing in gymnastics if they are over 17, and I'm being generous. That 21 year old fell off the balance beam, and then ass planted on her next event also! She's killing the team!
China has the right idea though. Their girls are all below the age of 12. I'm sorry, but China, you aren't fooling anyone. We know their passports say they are 16, and can legally compete in the Olympics, but you also have to remember that we know you are China. We know you have no qualms with cheating. We also know what a girl looks like when she's 8 and not 16. Surprisingly, there's quite a difference. You may be wrapped up in the stereotype that we think you all look alike, but we aren't that stupid! If I can tell the difference between a 4 month puppy and a 6 month puppy, I'm pretty sure I know that a human being is between the age bracket of 8-12 instead of 15-17. That's not a hard thing to figure out.
But hey, you're China, you can do what you want. When the Olympics are being held in London, we'll see how many 12 year old girls you'll be competing with!
...Probably a lot. England doesn't like confrontation with foreigners anymore.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
San Antonio's Number One
The truth is that San Antonio is statistically the most dangerous place in America to own a car. Everywhere else I've lived, I have probably seen about two or three accidents a year. All those times, I had never once actually see someone hit another person. In the three years I have lived in San Antonio, I have seen over several hundred. To put it simply, if there is a rainstorm and I haven't seen at least three separate collisions by the time I have reached my destination, I consider it a safe day.
Today, during a drive that lasted me seven minutes, I saw six. Ironically, I actually saw two of them happen. It is in times like that that I truly know just how stupid some people are. Both of those accidents could have been avoided if the drivers would just drive like intelligent people. The sad thing is that people simply aren't intelligent. Both of the accidents happened the same way. Two cars were speeding off into the rain doing about 75mph down the two-lane freeway that takes me to school. The rain was too thick, there was too much on the road, and as the car started driving up the hill where the thickest layer of moving water was concentrated, he hydroplaned and drove straight off into another car. The best part, right after accident one happened, the car behind him saw it happen, swerved around, and got into accident two right at the bottom of the next hill.
San Antonio drivers are just terrible.
Monday, August 11, 2008
Admitting Defeat
I do it the other way. I much prefer to, when someone admits they are wrong, rub it in their face for as long as I possibly can. When you do this, most people will respond in the same classic fashion. First, they will try to take back what they said. Then, when they realize they can't, they will try to shift the blame onto you somehow. It's like watching a fish out of water, struggling for some of that delicious H2O and not being able to find it. It's pathetic, sad, and at the same time oddly amusing.
I did this the other day with one of my girlfriend's friends. He was talking trying to sound smart, as most people do when they are around people they don't know, and he said something about how every life was valuable and no one should be killed ever. So naturally i jumped to the extreme end of the statement and asked him if he would kill Castro or Kim Jong-il if he bumped into them in a private location with no one around. Naturally, he stuttered and admitted he would gladly shoot them without any remorse. So, I spent the next twenty minutes making him admit who else he would kill. Apparently, he doesn't have much value for human life, and I'll tell you what, after that huge spiel I put him through, I bet you I'm on the rapidly growing list of people he would kill.
When people are wrong, it's great. Enjoy it. It's fun to poke at stupidity.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
The Internet isn't here for your Problems
We all have that friend who lives their life as if it's an emotional roller coaster. They fuck, they drink, they yell, they bitch, they complain, they cry (excessively), and they talk a lot of shit. In the end, they are usually the most fragile people on the face of the planet, acting tough to seem big when in truth they are so soft that one wrong word leads them to cry their eyes out in the confines of their bedroom. Really, if you think about it, it's sort of sad. But then, these types of people always bring what I'm about to say on themselves.
They have this obsession with letting everyone else know when they are pissed. They do it constantly, when they are in person they yell and pick fights, when they have friends around they talk shit behind peoples backs, and when no one is there to listen, they do the most pathetic thing of all and post their constant status on the internet. From away messages, to face book status changes, they are constantly updating their emotions, be it: "Pissed off" or "Hating you so much right now for what you did", they for some reason believe that the rest of the world cares even the slightest about their issues.
In truth, if they would just stop bitching for five minutes, maybe people would start caring. The reality of the situation is that even their closest friends end up rejecting their calls just to avoid another conversation about how their lives aren't perfect and why so-and-so did something that pissed them off.
If you are one of these people, or know one of these people, do the world a favour. Tell them to stop being who they are. The Internet is not a place for your problems, and more importantly, no one cares about them anyway.
Thursday, July 17, 2008
The Upcoming Electainment
This election in particular has really brought this to the surface. It just feels like I am watching low-quality entertainment. The sad thing is, this is real life. This isn't reality tv where people throw chairs and get drunk and have jobs pretending to be actors while living a house or trying to find out if their ex is cheating on them by going to a scripted hotel. This is real life. This is an election.
But just look at what is happening here. It's the most fantastic and dramatic circle of back stabbing, betrayal, and ignorance the world has ever seen! Let me break down the candidates for you how I see them:
President:
Obama: Is he black? Is he Muslim? Does he even like America? Who knows, and quite frankly, who cares! He's different, he's quiet, he seems to know a lot about something, though for the life of me I can't figure out what it is. But hey, he's nice, and that's what counts, especially in a world where everyone is trying to kill one-another.
McCain: A man so old that the silver in his fillings was brewed in the earth shortly after he was conceived. He is running for president with the one slogan that could ruin any man: "I support Bush". What with Bush's political support ratings currently less than Nixon's during his impeachment proceedings, it makes you wonder why a man would sell his career down the drain before it even begins.
Vice-President:
Hillary: A guaranteed victor in this role of "second-best", Hillary is known for her amazing ability to manipulate the world with her mind controlling abilities. It is believed that if you stare directly into her eyes, she will steal your soul from your body, and make you her mindless slave. She is the only one with any real intelligence, playing the cards to her total advantage. She has realized that, with Obama being the most likely President to be assassinated in the history of the United States, and McCain being almost 7,000 years old, she sees the opportunity to be President without even needing to put forth any effort.
I'm sorry, but it's completely undeniable that this election is purely for the entertainment of the viewers. It goes from comedy, to drama, to romance, to... anything before you even have time to judge it.
So welcome, to Electainment TV!
No Gun Laws
I want to make a side note here: I have in recent months made friends with a great many former servicemen. There seems to be an epidemic in the making here on a psychological level for many of our soldiers. It seems that a Vietnam-like response is happening with the war on terror. Everyone knows that when soldiers came back from Vietnam, the public ridiculed them and made their lives hell. Now it seems that instead of the public beating up the soldiers, the soldiers do it to themselves. I don't know a single grunt,or officer come to think of it(of which I will admit that I only know two), who has come back from Iraq and not hated everything about himself.
Odd really.
Back to the point, though. This guy in front of me started talking about how much he hated America. I'm fine with that, because honestly, I hate this place too. Apparently, we hated it for different reasons. I'm a big fan of taking matters into my own hands. I don't trust anyone, nor do I enjoy putting faith in others. It makes me uncomfortable. This goes for everyone; friends, family, police, etc. Well, this guy started telling me how America was all screwed up because of the fact that anyone can carry a gun.
I'm sorry, but that is one of America's saving graces. The guy started telling me how much safer Europe was than the states. I couldn't help but laugh at his misfortune. He was arguing with me, an Englishman with a great deal of personal experience with English life, about how England is safer than America. Let me explain just how wrong he was:
America grants citizens the right to carry a weapon. Granted, it runs the risk of putting registered firearms into the hands of bad people. It also gives good people the chance to carry exactly the same firepower as their enemies. Let's face it, police officers aren't always there. In fact, issues involving civilians quarrels aren't even high on their list of priorities. If someone were to pull out a gun and threaten to kill me, I would like to have the same luxury of drawing a weapon on him. Fighting fire with fire can be extremely useful at times.
England, however, doesn't have that luxury. In the UK, if you want to get a gun, you can. It's illegal, and you have to go through some shady ass people, but it's possible to do. This limits the possession of firearms to bad people. Cops don't even carry guns in the UK. It's considered "unsafe". Think about that for a minute. If a guy draws a gun on you in England, your options are as follows: give him everything you own and beg for you life, or try to punch him- hard- hard enough that he'll go down in one hit, or you're dead.
I'm sorry, but gun control is a terrible idea. Bad people will always find a way to get weapons. I would like a fighting chance if I find myself being held at gunpoint. But hey, that's just me.
Thursday, July 10, 2008
ESP or Evolution?
Don't get me wrong, I've always known that evolution has been argued by the blind. I mean, it's hard for the ignorant to understand science. Knowledge scares them. I think their reaction to education is similar to the reaction of cavemen to fire. It's scary, it's dangerous, and quite frankly, it hurts them. For even an ignorant idiot to stand up and say "I'm telling you, my sister can read my mind, one time she passed me a bag of chips when I hadn't even asked for them. But that there fossil aint no proof of nothing! I don't care if there's clear and obvious connections to modern day mammals, that there rat is clearly just a retarded rat!
But hey, now that I've clearly stated my opinion, what do you think? Do you believe in evolution? Do you believe the Earth is the third planet from the sun? Do you believe in gravity? Do you believe in ESP? If your answers were anything other than yes, yes, yes, no, then I propose this question for you to sit down and think about: What is wrong with you?
Works Cited:
Lefrancois, Guy. Theories of Human Learning: What the Old Woman Said. 5th ed. Thomas Wadsworth, Belmont CA 2006.
Monday, June 30, 2008
One Way Out
A lot of people ask me how I can live like that, believing that this is all we get. To me, it's not a matter of planning for the future, or hoping that something will continue on just to avoid the nothing that is inevitably before me. It is simply a matter of truth.
We go through this life making decisions that effect not only ourselves, but countless hundreds of others also. We may not realize we are doing it at the time, but every single action has a consequence. The simple act of purchasing a chicken from the grocery store means that there is one less chicken in the world for someone else. That single purchase may have influenced the market so that more chickens were sold to stores rather than sold/given to charities to feed the starving. In that sense, your purchase shifted food away from the starving and fed your already healthy body inevitably killing a starving man, woman, or child elsewhere in the world.
We cannot function focusing only on consequence. We must live to provide the best possible lives for ourselves, and those we know and love. It is impossible to think for everyone, or hurt no one. Everything will cause someone pain or grief, and give someone else joy and hope.
The truth of the matter is this: Life is here, and no matter what you believe will happen once it is over, there is one thing you can be certain about. You can fight against hurting people, you can fight to achieve your every goal, and you can even fight to survive. But no matter how hard you try, in the end, life its self is the one fight that you will never come out of alive.
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
100% Genuine!
"Now with REAL Cheese!"
What was I eating before?! I have been buying Ham and Cheese hot pockets for years now, and you mean to tell me that up until this box, that yellow delicious inside the bread coating wasn't cheese? What the hell was it then?!
Wendy's did something similar to me also. It was around 2003-2004 when they started to advertise their dollar menu, as did most fast food chains. Honestly, I never had much faith that the quality or grade of meat is high when I'm eating at a fast food chain, but I like to know that what I'm eating is actually the meat I'm ordering. For example, Hong Kong had to close down one of its KFC's because the KFC was substituting its chicken meat for rat meat. I ate there a couple times before they closed it down. So obviously, since then, I have always enjoyed knowing my beef is beef, my chicken is chicken, and my fish is fish. Well, when Wendy's started advertising their 5 chicken nuggets for a dollar, it ran with this slogan:
"Now with all genuine chicken meat!"
Again, what the hell?! What was I eating before? It is called a chicken nugget, so I expect it to be a CHICKEN nugget. Why are you telling me now that all the chicken nuggets I had in the past from you, Wendy, are really just anything nuggets. What meat was in there before it was chicken?!
Stupid world and its crazy food groups.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Wiped!
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Chinese Miracle
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
My Previous Argument
That's not entirely true. I do like contradiction, and if you really can prove me wrong, I would love to hear it. If it's a compelling argument, I will even recant my previous argument regarding omnipotence, however, I think you're going to have some problems doing that. Let me explain why.
I think those of you who are shaking their heads negatively at me are not reading the bolded words on the previous post. Let me redefine omnipotence for you:
Omnipotent
Having unlimited or universal power, authority, or force; all-powerful.
That's the dictionary definition of omnipotent. Universal power. All-powerful. Therefor, it doesn't matter what you say about the situation, what you try to do, this being could change it. It has the power to do absolutely anything, be it conceivable or not. You don't have to be able to understand how or why, you just have to understand the definition. There is no end to what an omnipotent being could do, because it can do anything. Therefor, no matter what you throw at me, no matter how much you try to convince me that it could never be, the simple definition of omnipotence slaps you in the face. In some sense, you're right. You can very well convince me, or stop me or even God from changing math. But when it comes to an omnipotent being, then sadly, there is absolutely nothing he can't do.
Nothing.
Throw all the proofs, theorems, equations, and arguments at me that you want. Defeat me if you can. But never will you be able to say that an omnipotent being can't do something, because it can do anything.
Which leads me to my next question: could two omnipotent beings exist simultaneously? If the being is all-knowing and all-powerful, then it would exist everywhere at once and be capable of thinking absolutely everything at the same time. If two beings existed everywhere at once thinking everything at the same time, would they not be just one being? If they think the same, act the same, exist in the same place, are we sure there's even two, or is it still just one?
I stand by my statement with which I opened up the previous post: Omnipotence is very, very, very interesting
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Omnipotence
Many religions believe that an omnipotent god exists, but equally as many believe that one doesn't. I had a discussion the other day in my philosophy class that I would like to share with all of you. First, I will pose the question to you, and then you can answer it before I declare my beliefs in the matter. If you don't like that idea, you can just read on from the following paragraph straight into my response. It's really up to you.
The question was as follows:
Could an Omnipotent make it so that rules that could never be broken could be broken? For example: 2+3=5. Could an Omnipotent being make it so that 2+3=6 without changing the way you perceived the world?
What do you, my readers, have to say about this? Before you answer the question, take a look at this guys name: is that not one of coolest names you've ever seen? Alistair. Don't you feel like he should be wearing royal robes and a crown? Anyhow, back to the main question. What do you think?
My class said "No, because math is math, and it follows the same basic rules regardless of how you treat it. Because of this, the end result would always be five if you took two and three and added them up. Not even an omnipotent being could change that."
If you were thinking something along the lines of my class, allow me to share with you just how wrong you really are. It's rather simple really, if you think about it. It's all in the definition of the key word being used here: Omnipotent. Omnipotence means all knowing and all powerful. I don't much like using bold to make a point, but I can't help it I'm afraid. If I were to try and emphasize the importance of that definition through my words, it would take me hours. So, instead, it's bolded to let you know that every time you start questioning this response, an omnipotent being is ALL knowing and ALL powerful.
If a being were omnipotent, it would have the ability to do whatever it wanted whenever it wanted. If it wanted to, it certainly could make 2+3=6. It could, using it's unlimited power, make it so that every time you took two of an item and put them with three of another item, a sixth item poofed out of thin air and you had six. It would simply be the way things were, and you would not have changed your understanding of math, but instead have learned that if you have two, and add three, you always get six.
The biggest problem with this argument is, however, that it is self defeating. Why would an omnipotent being ever want to do this? It's omnipotent, and therefor knows the end result of every conceivable event already. What motivation would it have to do anything? The only reason an omnipotent being would act would be if it couldn't possibly know what happened next, because if it already knew, it would have essentially already have done it in its mind and therefor would not be concerned with trying again.
Omnipotence is a very, very interesting concept.
Monday, April 21, 2008
Need to Clean
Sunday, April 13, 2008
An (Un)fortunate U-Turn
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Returning With Change
Monday, February 11, 2008
Dumbest Conversation Ever
James says (9:21 PM):
you know what we should do?
Robert says (9:21 PM):
what?
James says (9:22 PM):
if when aliens came to earth, we peed on them, telling them that's how we greet oneanother
James says (9:22 PM):
it could be earth's joke
Robert says (9:22 PM):
Hmm, i don't know.
Robert says (9:22 PM):
They might be expecting that.
James says (9:23 PM):
maybe... we'd have to get someone good at not laughing to do it
James says (9:23 PM):
one snicker would make them suspect something
Robert says (9:23 PM):
And with a big dick.
Robert says (9:23 PM):
Because we don't want to look small.
James says (9:23 PM):
true
Robert says (9:23 PM):
Aliens usually prioritze strength by gurth...
Robert says (9:23 PM):
or so i've heard.
James says (9:23 PM):
me too
Robert says (9:24 PM):
yeah i think it could work.
James says (9:24 PM):
perhaps if their weakness was pee
James says (9:24 PM):
we could kill them with big dick urination
Robert says (9:25 PM):
That would just suck.
James says (9:25 PM):
so they'd die knowing our big penis' saved us all
Robert says (9:25 PM):
They would probobly then kill us.
Robert says (9:25 PM):
Yeah but if there are alot of them.
Robert says (9:25 PM):
That would be alot of urine.
James says (9:25 PM):
well, we'd lure them down with promises of candy
James says (9:26 PM):
or everyone would have to pee into a pee cannon
James says (9:26 PM):
which would be a huge supersoaker
James says (9:26 PM):
that shoots into space
Robert says (9:26 PM):
Well if urine is there weakness they wouldn't want candy.
James says (9:26 PM):
what if it was delicious candy?
Robert says (9:27 PM):
Maybe if it was very delicious looking.
James says (9:27 PM):
and then we'd pee cannon them
James says (9:27 PM):
which we'd market out to Supersoaker to build
James says (9:28 PM):
they're good at shooting fluids
Robert says (9:28 PM):
How could a urine cannon work?
Robert says (9:28 PM):
Everybody knows urine can't be preassurized.
James says (9:29 PM):
it'd be in a liquidgel film
James says (9:29 PM):
so when it fires, it'll be in a mushy wrapping
Robert says (9:29 PM):
Oh, smart thinking.
James says (9:29 PM):
and then when it impacts the target, it explodes like a water balloon
Robert says (9:29 PM):
What if the aliens are made of marshmellow.
James says (9:29 PM):
is their weakness still urine?
Robert says (9:29 PM):
Well that or being eaten i guess.
Robert says (9:29 PM):
How would the shell break on them.
James says (9:29 PM):
easy
James says (9:30 PM):
we'd attach a targeting laser to the cannon
James says (9:30 PM):
and put a detonation device inside the round
Robert says (9:30 PM):
Ah, do you think we'll have thta technology by then?
James says (9:30 PM):
so when it reaches the exact distance of the target, the device explodes
James says (9:30 PM):
i think if our lives depended on it, we'd be able to pull it off
Robert says (9:30 PM):
Smart thinking.
Robert says (9:30 PM):
Looks like you've got this all planned.
James says (9:30 PM):
i think so
Robert says (9:31 PM):
Just one question?
James says (9:31 PM):
yep?
Robert says (9:31 PM):
What if aliens come and their weakness isn't urine?
James says (9:31 PM):
i'm not prepared to face that problem
James says (9:31 PM):
let someone else do it
Robert says (9:31 PM):
lol
James says (9:31 PM):
i already created the contingency for urine weakened aliens
Robert says (9:31 PM):
perfect response